1 Introduction

The Aedes aegypti mosquito is a highly invasive species known for its role as a primary vector in the transmission of several significant arboviruses, including dengue, chikungunya, Zika, and yellow fever viruses. This mosquito species has adapted remarkably well to urban environments, often breeding in artificial containers and thriving in close proximity to human populations (Näslund et al., 2021). The global distribution of Ae. aegypti has expanded dramatically, facilitated by increased global trade and travel, which has led to its presence on all continents, including North America and Europe (Kraemer et al., 2015). The ability of Ae. aegypti to sustain transmission cycles in urban settings without relying on natural reservoirs has further cemented its status as a critical vector in the spread of these diseases (Lwande et al., 2020).

Understanding the impact of Ae. aegypti on global public health is of paramount importance due to the severe health and economic burdens associated with the diseases it transmits. Dengue, for instance, is the most prevalent arboviral disease affecting humans, with significant morbidity and mortality rates (Lambrechts et al., 2010). The rapid geographical spread of Ae. aegypti has led to frequent outbreaks and the establishment of these viruses in new regions, often affecting immunologically naive populations (Ryan et al., 2017). Climate change is expected to exacerbate this issue by altering the distribution and transmission dynamics of Ae. aegypti, potentially exposing nearly a billion people to new risks (Mulderij-Jansen et al., 2022). Effective public health planning and intervention strategies are crucial to mitigate the spread and impact of these vector-borne diseases (Kraemer et al., 2015).

This study is to comprehensively assess the global impact of Aedes aegypti on public health. It will analyze data on the current and projected future distribution of Ae. aegypti, considering factors such as climate change and urbanization, examine the prevalence and incidence of diseases transmitted by Ae. aegypti, including dengue, chikungunya, Zika, and yellow fever, and their associated health and economic impacts, review the effectiveness of various control measures implemented to manage Ae. aegypti populations and reduce disease transmission, highlighting successful interventions and identifying gaps in current strategies, and utilize predictive models to forecast the potential future risks posed by Ae. aegypti under different climate change scenarios and propose recommendations for public health preparedness. By synthesizing the available evidence, this study seeks to provide information for the development of more effective and sustainable public health interventions.

2 Biology and Ecology of Aedes aegypti

2.1 Description of Aedes aegypti’s life cycle, breeding habits, and physical characteristics

Aedes aegypti is a mosquito species known for its role as a vector for several arboviruses, including dengue, Zika, and yellow fever. The life cycle of Ae. aegypti consists of four stages: egg, larva, pupa, and adult. The eggs are laid on the walls of water-containing containers just above the waterline and can withstand desiccation for several months, allowing them to survive in dry conditions until they are submerged in water (Kramer et al., 2020). Upon hatching, the larvae go through four instar stages, feeding on organic matter in the water. The pupal stage is a non-feeding, transitional phase that lasts for a few days before emerging as adults.

Physically, Ae. aegypti can be identified by its small, dark body with white markings on the legs and a distinctive lyre-shaped pattern of silver-white scales on the thorax. The adult females are the primary vectors of disease as they require blood meals for egg development, while males feed on nectar (Facchinelli et al., 2023).

2.2 Habitat preferences and global distribution

Aedes aegypti is highly adaptable and thrives in urban environments, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. It prefers to breed in artificial containers such as discarded tires, flower pots, and water storage containers, which are commonly found in human habitats (Hery et al., 2020). This species has a strong preference for human blood, which facilitates its role in disease transmission.

Globally, Ae. aegypti is distributed across tropical and subtropical regions but has also been reported in temperate areas due to its ability to adapt to various environmental conditions (Figure 1) (Iwamura et al., 2020). Climate change and global trade have facilitated its spread to new regions, including parts of Europe and North America (Kramer et al., 2021). In Mainland China, for instance, Ae. aegypti is predicted to expand its habitat under future climate scenarios, increasing the areas and populations at risk (Liu et al., 2019).

Figure 1 Distribution of annual LCC of Ae. aegypti with occurrence data overlaid (Adopted from Iwamura et al., 2020) Image caption: Maps indicate the total number of LCC per year at the global scale (a), Central America (b), West Africa (c) and South East Asia (d). Colour represents the number of LCC. Areas in which LCC < 10, corresponding to the threshold used in subsequent analysis, are shown with a darker palette (indigo-black, note legend). Grey colour represents unsuitable areas for Ae. aegypti development. Magenta dots represent presence records of Ae. aegypti (Adopted from Iwamura et al., 2020)

2.3 Factors contributing to the proliferation and spread of Aedes aegypti

Several factors contribute to the proliferation and spread of Ae. aegypti. One significant factor is its ecophysiological plasticity, which allows it to survive in a wide range of environmental conditions. Studies have shown that Ae. aegypti can survive winter cold, especially when acclimated, suggesting that climate change could further facilitate its spread to colder regions (Kramer et al., 2020).

Socioeconomic factors also play a crucial role in the distribution of Ae. aegypti. The species relies heavily on human-made habitats for breeding, and areas with poor waste management and water storage practices provide ideal conditions for its proliferation (Holeva-Eklund et al., 2019). Additionally, the close association with human populations and the ability to exploit various larval habitats, both natural and artificial, contribute to its widespread distribution (Xia et al., 2021).

Interspecific competition with other mosquito species, such as Aedes albopictus, can influence the distribution and abundance of Ae. aegypti. While Ae. aegypti can act as a biotic barrier to the expansion of Ae. albopictus in some regions, the two species often coexist, with their interactions affecting their respective population dynamics (Lizuain et al., 2022; Lizuain et al., 2023).

3 Diseases Transmitted by Aedes aegypti

3.1 Overview of key diseases: dengue, zika, chikungunya, and yellow fever

Aedes aegypti, a highly invasive mosquito species, is a primary vector for several significant arboviral diseases, including Dengue, Zika, Chikungunya, and Yellow Fever. Dengue is one of the fastest-growing global infectious diseases, with 100-400 million new infections annually, largely due to the adaptation of Ae. aegypti to urban environments (Brady and Hay, 2020). Zika virus, which gained global attention during the 2015-2016 outbreak in the Americas, is also primarily transmitted by Ae. aegypti and is associated with severe congenital disabilities such as microcephaly (Guerbois et al., 2015). Chikungunya, another arbovirus transmitted by Ae. aegypti, causes debilitating joint pain and has seen significant outbreaks in various regions, including the Americas and Europe (Bohers et al., 2020). Yellow Fever, historically a major public health threat, continues to cause outbreaks, particularly in Africa and South America, with Ae. aegypti being a key vector (Akiner et al., 2016).

3.2 Transmission dynamics and the role of Aedes aegypti in disease outbreaks

The transmission dynamics of these arboviruses are closely linked to the biology and behavior of Ae. aegypti. This mosquito species thrives in urban environments, breeding in artificial containers and biting humans preferentially, which facilitates the rapid spread of viruses. The ability of Ae. aegypti to adapt to various climatic conditions and its high vector competence for multiple viruses make it a formidable vector (Näslund et al., 2021). For instance, during the Zika outbreak in Mexico, Ae. aegypti was confirmed as the principal vector, highlighting its role in the northward spread of the virus. Similarly, the resurgence of Ae. aegypti in Europe raises concerns about potential outbreaks of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika in previously non-endemic regions.

3.3 Public health challenges posed by the co-circulation of these diseases

The co-circulation of Dengue, Zika, Chikungunya, and Yellow Fever presents significant public health challenges. The overlapping symptoms of these diseases complicate diagnosis and treatment, leading to potential mismanagement of cases. Additionally, the simultaneous presence of multiple arboviruses increases the burden on healthcare systems and complicates vector control efforts. For example, in Puerto Rico, the emergence of Zika and Chikungunya in the context of existing Dengue transmission highlighted the need for integrated vector management strategies (Barrera et al., 2018). Furthermore, socioeconomic factors play a crucial role in the transmission dynamics, with lower socioeconomic areas often experiencing higher disease prevalence due to inadequate infrastructure and limited access to healthcare (Delmelle and Oguzie, 2020). Continuous virological surveillance and innovative prevention strategies are essential to mitigate the impact of these co-circulating arboviruses (Reis et al., 2019; Näslund et al., 2021).

4 Global Health Impact of Aedes aegypti

4.1 Statistics on morbidity and mortality related to Aedes aegypti-transmitted diseases

Aedes aegypti is a primary vector for several significant arboviral diseases, including dengue, Zika, chikungunya, and yellow fever. Dengue alone accounts for 100-400 million new infections annually, making it one of the fastest-growing global infectious diseases (Brady and Hay, 2020). The geographical spread of these diseases is extensive, with 146 countries reporting at least one arboviral disease and 123 countries reporting more than one (Leta et al., 2018). The morbidity and mortality associated with these diseases are substantial, with frequent outbreaks leading to significant health burdens globally (Näslund et al., 2021).

4.2 Economic burden on healthcare systems and societies

The economic impact of Aedes aegypti-transmitted diseases is profound, affecting both healthcare systems and broader societal structures. The frequent outbreaks of diseases such as dengue, Zika, and chikungunya impose significant costs on healthcare systems due to the need for medical treatment, vector control measures, and public health interventions. In regions like Fortaleza, Brazil, the costs associated with arboviruses to both government and households are substantial, highlighting the economic strain on vulnerable areas. Additionally, the global transportation systems and the adaptability of Aedes aegypti to new environments exacerbate the economic burden by facilitating the spread of these diseases to new regions (Näslund et al., 2021).

4.3 Impact on vulnerable populations, including children, pregnant women, and the elderly

Vulnerable populations, including children, pregnant women, and the elderly, are disproportionately affected by Aedes aegypti-transmitted diseases. For instance, Zika virus infections during pregnancy can lead to severe congenital disabilities, such as microcephaly, posing significant health risks to both mothers and infants. Children and the elderly are also at higher risk of severe disease outcomes and complications from infections like dengue and chikungunya, which can lead to long-term health issues and increased mortality rates (Näslund et al., 2021). The impact on these populations underscores the need for targeted public health interventions and preventive strategies to mitigate the risks associated with Aedes aegypti-transmitted diseases (Macêdo et al., 2021).

5 Case Study: Dengue Fever Outbreaks in Southeast Asia

5.1 Overview of dengue fever epidemiology in Southeast Asia

Dengue fever, a mosquito-borne viral infection, has become a significant public health concern in Southeast Asia. The region experiences frequent and severe outbreaks, largely due to the high population density and favorable climatic conditions for mosquito breeding. Dengue is transmitted primarily by the Aedes aegypti mosquito, which thrives in urban environments where stagnant water is abundant (Figure 2). The disease burden in Southeast Asia is substantial, with millions of cases reported annually, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. The rapid urbanization and inadequate waste management practices in many Southeast Asian countries exacerbate the situation, providing ideal breeding grounds for Aedes mosquitoes (Brady and Hay, 2020).

Figure 2 Schematic of the main factors making Aedes aegypti a highly effective vector for dengue and other arboviruses (Adopted from Brady and Hay, 2020)

5.2 Role of Aedes aegypti in driving the frequency and severity of outbreaks

Aedes aegypti is the principal vector responsible for the transmission of dengue fever in Southeast Asia. This mosquito species has adapted exceptionally well to urban environments, where it finds ample breeding sites in artificial containers such as discarded tires, water storage barrels, and animal troughs (Badolo et al., 2022). The high anthropophilic nature of Ae. aegypti, with over 90% of blood meals derived from humans, facilitates efficient virus transmission. The mosquito's ability to breed in close proximity to human habitation and its exophilic behavior contribute to the high frequency and severity of dengue outbreaks. Additionally, the geographic heterogeneity in mosquito bionomics, influenced by factors such as rainfall, container water levels, and urbanization, plays a crucial role in the dynamics of dengue transmission (Brady and Hay, 2020).

5.3 Public health responses and lessons learned from the region

Public health responses to dengue fever outbreaks in Southeast Asia have included a combination of vector control strategies, public education campaigns, and community engagement. Effective vector control methods have focused on reducing mosquito breeding sites through improved waste management and the use of insecticides. Community-driven practices, such as regular cleaning of water containers and proper disposal of waste, have been emphasized to minimize mosquito breeding. Integrated strategies combining these practices with insecticide-based interventions have shown promise in reducing the risk and magnitude of outbreaks  (Badolo et al., 2022).

Lessons learned from the region highlight the importance of a multi-faceted approach to dengue control. Continuous monitoring of mosquito populations and environmental factors is essential for timely and effective interventions. Public health authorities must also prioritize community involvement and education to ensure sustainable vector control efforts. The experience in Southeast Asia underscores the need for regional collaboration and the development of comprehensive strategies tailored to the specific ecological and socio-economic contexts of each country  (Badolo et al., 2022).

6 Control Strategies and Challenges

6.1 Traditional vector control methods

Traditional vector control methods for Aedes aegypti primarily involve the use of insecticides, larvicides, and environmental management. Insecticides such as pyrethroids, organophosphates, and carbamates are widely used to control adult mosquito populations. However, the effectiveness of these chemicals is increasingly compromised due to the development of insecticide resistance. Studies have shown that Aedes populations exhibit varying levels of resistance to different classes of insecticides, with significant geographical variation (Smith et al., 2016; Collins et al., 2022; Asgarian et al., 2023). For instance, in Sri Lanka, Aedes populations have shown high resistance to DDT but remain susceptible to malathion and propoxur, except in certain regions like Jaffna where moderate resistance to malathion has been observed.

Larvicides, such as temephos, are used to target the larval stages of mosquitoes. Laboratory and field studies in Sri Lanka have demonstrated that temephos can maintain high larval mortality rates for several months, although its effectiveness diminishes over time due to environmental factors and water usage (Karunaratne et al., 2013). Environmental management, including the elimination of breeding sites and community participation in source reduction, is also crucial. Integrated control interventions that combine biological control measures, environmental management, and health education campaigns have been found to achieve more sustainable results compared to chemical control alone (Mulderij-Jansen et al., 2022).

6.2 Innovations in vector control

Innovative vector control strategies are being developed to address the limitations of traditional methods. Genetic modification of mosquitoes, the introduction of Wolbachia bacteria, and sterile insect techniques (SIT) are among the promising approaches.

Genetic modification involves altering the mosquito genome to reduce their ability to transmit diseases or to suppress mosquito populations. For example, mosquitoes can be engineered to carry genes that render them sterile or reduce their lifespan. The introduction of Wolbachia bacteria, which can interfere with mosquito reproduction and reduce their ability to transmit viruses, is another innovative strategy. Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes have been shown to have reduced vector competence for arboviruses such as dengue, Zika, and chikungunya (Näslund et al., 2021).

The sterile insect technique involves releasing large numbers of sterilized male mosquitoes into the wild to mate with females, resulting in no offspring and a subsequent reduction in the mosquito population. These innovative methods offer potential advantages over traditional chemical controls, including reduced environmental impact and the ability to target specific mosquito species without affecting non-target organisms.

6.3 Challenges in implementation and sustainability of control strategies

Despite the promise of both traditional and innovative vector control methods, several challenges hinder their implementation and sustainability. One of the primary challenges is the development of insecticide resistance, which reduces the effectiveness of chemical control measures. Resistance management strategies, such as rotating insecticides with different modes of action and integrating non-chemical methods, are essential to mitigate this issue (Amlalo et al., 2022).

Financial and resource constraints also pose significant challenges. Effective vector control requires sustained funding, adequate resources, and a trained workforce. In many regions, especially in Latin America and the Caribbean, insufficient financial support and resources have been identified as major barriers to the successful implementation of control programs (Mulderij-Jansen et al., 2022). Additionally, intersectoral collaboration and strong legislation are necessary to support comprehensive vector control efforts.

Community participation is another critical factor for the success of vector control programs. Engaging communities in source reduction and environmental management activities can enhance the sustainability of control measures. However, maintaining active community involvement over the long term can be challenging and requires continuous education and outreach efforts.

7 Climate Change and Aedes aegypti Proliferation

7.1 How climate change is expanding the range of Aedes aegypti

Climate change is significantly impacting the distribution of Aedes aegypti, a primary vector for diseases such as dengue, chikungunya, and Zika. Rising global temperatures are creating more favorable conditions for the mosquito, allowing it to expand into previously unsuitable areas. For instance, studies have shown that climate change is likely to cause a poleward shift in the distribution of Aedes aegypti, with new exposures expected in Europe and high-elevation tropical and subtropical regions. In Taiwan, predictions indicate that Aedes aegypti will expand its habitat beyond its current niche range under various climate scenarios. Similarly, in Mainland China, the mosquito is expected to extend its range from southern regions to more northern areas (Liu et al., 2019). These expansions are driven by increasing temperatures and changes in precipitation patterns, which create more suitable environments for the mosquito's lifecycle.

7.2 Seasonal variations in mosquito population dynamics

Seasonal variations play a crucial role in the population dynamics of Aedes aegypti. Temperature and rainfall are key factors influencing mosquito abundance and distribution. For example, rainfall can significantly impact mosquito populations by providing breeding sites, but excessive rainfall or drought can also limit their proliferation. In Taiwan, the geographic range of Aedes aegypti is influenced by the temporal distribution of rainfall, with rainy winters in the north and dry winters in the south affecting mosquito abundance (Valdez et al., 2017). Additionally, climate change is expected to alter seasonal patterns, potentially leading to extended periods suitable for mosquito development and increased life-cycle completions (Iwamura et al., 2020). This could result in higher mosquito populations during warmer months and a shift towards more seasonal risk across different regions (Ryan et al., 2017).

7.3 Future projections and potential hotspots for Aedes aegypti activity

Future projections indicate that climate change will continue to drive the expansion of Aedes aegypti into new areas, creating potential hotspots for mosquito activity. By 2100, major European cities could face significant risks of Aedes aegypti infestation under high carbon emission scenarios (Liu-Helmersson et al., 2019). In North America and China, the invasion fronts of Aedes aegypti are projected to accelerate, with the mosquito's range expanding at a rate of 6 km per year by 2050. In Mexico, the mosquito has already been recorded at higher elevations than previously observed, suggesting that mountainous regions could become new hotspots for mosquito-borne diseases (Equihua et al., 2017). These projections underscore the importance of climate change mitigation efforts, as limiting global warming could significantly reduce the risk of Aedes aegypti proliferation and associated disease outbreaks (Liu-Helmersson et al., 2019).

8 Community Engagement and Public Health Education

8.1 The role of community involvement in mosquito control efforts

Community involvement plays a crucial role in the control of Aedes aegypti populations, which are vectors for diseases such as dengue, chikungunya, and Zika. Integrated vector management strategies that include community participation have been shown to be more effective and sustainable compared to those relying solely on chemical control measures. For instance, a scoping review of interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean highlighted that health education campaigns and community participation were key components of successful mosquito control efforts (Mulderij-Jansen et al., 2022). Similarly, a systematic review and meta-analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials found that community mobilization significantly reduced entomological indices, indicating lower mosquito populations (Alvarado-Castro et al., 2017). These findings underscore the importance of engaging communities in mosquito control activities to achieve long-term success.

8.2 Public health campaigns and their effectiveness in reducing Aedes aegypti populations

Public health campaigns are essential tools in the fight against Aedes aegypti. These campaigns often focus on educating the public about the importance of eliminating mosquito breeding sites and using protective measures to prevent mosquito bites. In Australia, a public health intervention that included extensive community engagement and education successfully reduced the Aedes aegypti population below detection thresholds (Trewin et al., 2022). The intervention involved local stakeholders and utilized enhanced entomological surveillance and vector control activities, demonstrating the effectiveness of well-coordinated public health campaigns. Additionally, the systematic review of interventions for Aedes aegypti control found that community mobilization efforts, which are often part of public health campaigns, were consistently effective in reducing mosquito populations (Alvarado-Castro et al., 2017).

8.3 Case studies of successful community-led initiatives

Several case studies illustrate the success of community-led initiatives in controlling Aedes aegypti populations. In Australia, a collaborative effort between research agencies and local stakeholders led to the successful elimination of Aedes aegypti through community engagement and targeted vector control activities (Trewin et al., 2022). This initiative included public education on the importance of removing potential mosquito breeding sites and the use of insecticides and genetic surveillance methods.

In Latin America and the Caribbean, integrated control interventions that involved community participation achieved more sustainable results compared to those relying solely on chemical control measures (Mulderij-Jansen et al., 2022). These initiatives often included health education campaigns that empowered communities to take an active role in mosquito control, leading to significant reductions in mosquito populations and associated disease transmission.

9 Policy and Global Coordination

9.1 Overview of international policies and frameworks addressing Aedes aegypti-borne diseases

International policies and frameworks addressing Aedes aegypti-borne diseases have evolved significantly over the past decades. These policies are primarily aimed at controlling the spread of diseases such as dengue, Zika, chikungunya, and yellow fever, which are transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. The World Health Organization (WHO) has been at the forefront, developing comprehensive strategies and guidelines for vector control and disease management. For instance, the WHO’s Global Vector Control Response 2017-2030 outlines a strategic approach to strengthen vector control worldwide, emphasizing integrated vector management (IVM) and community engagement (Mulderij-Jansen et al., 2022). Additionally, regional frameworks, such as those implemented in Latin America and the Caribbean, focus on sustainable and effective control strategies tailored to local contexts.

9.2 The role of global health organizations in coordinating efforts

Global health organizations play a crucial role in coordinating efforts to combat Aedes aegypti-borne diseases. The WHO, in collaboration with other international bodies such as the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), provides technical support, resources, and guidelines to countries affected by these diseases. These organizations facilitate the sharing of best practices, data, and research findings, which are essential for developing effective control strategies. For example, the WHO's Global Vector Control Response emphasizes the importance of intersectoral collaboration and community participation in achieving sustainable vector control. Furthermore, these organizations support capacity-building initiatives to enhance the ability of countries to respond to outbreaks and implement long-term control measures (Kraemer et al., 2019; Brady and Hay, 2020).

9.3 Challenges in achieving global cooperation and the need for policy innovation

Achieving global cooperation in the fight against Aedes aegypti-borne diseases presents several challenges. One of the primary obstacles is the variability in resources and infrastructure across different regions, which can hinder the implementation of effective control measures. Insufficient financial support, limited workforce, and lack of intersectoral collaboration are common issues that impede progress. Additionally, the adaptability of Aedes aegypti to changing environmental conditions and its ability to thrive in urban settings complicate control efforts (Liu et al., 2019).

There is a pressing need for policy innovation to address these challenges. Innovative strategies, such as the development of predictive models for mosquito distribution under climate change scenarios, can help in anticipating and mitigating future risks (Liu et al., 2019; Iwamura et al., 2020). Moreover, policies that promote integrated vector management, combining biological control measures, environmental management, and health education campaigns, have shown promise in achieving more sustainable results. Strengthening global surveillance systems and enhancing data sharing among countries are also critical for early detection and response to outbreaks (Näslund et al., 2021).

10 Concluding Remarks

The global impact of Aedes aegypti on public health is undeniable. As a primary vector for significant arboviral diseases such as dengue, Zika, chikungunya, and yellow fever, the spread of this mosquito species has posed a serious threat to the health of millions of people worldwide, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. Its rapid geographic expansion, high adaptability to urban environments, and the close link to global warming and human activities have made controlling Aedes aegypti-transmitted diseases increasingly challenging.

To address this global issue, there is a critical need for integrated and sustainable vector control strategies. Sole reliance on chemical control measures is insufficient, especially in light of the growing problem of insecticide resistance. Community engagement, environmental management, biological control, genetic modification technologies, and the introduction of Wolbachia bacteria have all shown promise. However, long-term success requires multilayered coordination and cooperation. Additionally, public health education and cross-sector collaboration are vital in ensuring widespread and sustained implementation of control measures.

Future research should focus on the biology of mosquitoes, resistance mechanisms, and their dynamic expansion under climate change, particularly through the development of predictive models to anticipate future transmission risks. At the policy level, international health organizations and national governments must collaborate to establish more robust cross-border surveillance and control frameworks, driving stronger legislation and resource allocation. Furthermore, public health interventions should continue to prioritize community mobilization and education, enhancing public awareness and participation in source reduction and disease prevention. Through these efforts, countries around the world can more effectively combat the health threats posed by Aedes aegypti.

Acknowledgments

EcoEvo Publisher thanks the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Akiner M., Demirci B., Babuadze G., Robert V., and Schaffner F., 2016, Spread of the invasive mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in the Black Sea region increases risk of chikungunya, dengue, and Zika outbreaks in Europe, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10(4): e0004664.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004664

Alvarado-Castro V., Paredes-Solís S., Nava-Aguilera E., Morales-Pérez A., Alarcón-Morales L., Balderas-Vargas N., and Andersson N., 2017, Assessing the effects of interventions for Aedes aegypti control: systematic review and meta-analysis of cluster randomised controlled trials, BMC Public Health, 17(Suppl 1): 384.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4290-z

Amlalo G., Akorli J., Akyea-Bobi N., Akporh S., Aqua-Baidoo D., Opoku M., Frempong K., Pi-Bansa S., Boakye H., Joannides J., Osei J., Pwalia R., Akorli E., Manu A., and Dadzie S., 2022, Evidence of high frequencies of insecticide resistance mutations in Aedes aegypti (Culicidae) mosquitoes in urban Accra, Ghana: implications for insecticide-based vector control of Aedes-borne arboviral diseases, Journal of Medical Entomology, 59: 2090-2101.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjac120

Asgarian T., Vatandoost H., Hanafi-Bojd A., and Nikpoor F., 2023, Worldwide status of insecticide resistance of Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus, vectors of arboviruses of chikungunya, dengue, Zika and yellow fever, Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases, 17: 1-27.

https://doi.org/10.18502/jad.v17i1.13198

Badolo A., Sombié A., Yaméogo F., Wangrawa D., Sanon A., Pignatelli P., Sanon A., Viana M., Kanuka H., Weetman D., and McCall P., 2022, First comprehensive analysis of Aedes aegypti bionomics during an arbovirus outbreak in West Africa: dengue in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 2016–2017, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 16(7): e0010059.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010059

Barrera R., Amador M., Acevedo V., Beltran M., and Munoz J., 2018, A comparison of mosquito densities, weather and infection rates of Aedes aegypti during the first epidemics of chikungunya (2014) and Zika (2016) in areas with and without vector control in Puerto Rico, Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 33: 68-77.

https://doi.org/10.1111/mve.12338

Bohers C., Mousson L., Madec Y., Vazeille M., Rhim A., M’ghirbi Y., Bouattour A., and Failloux A., 2020, The recently introduced Aedes albopictus in Tunisia has the potential to transmit chikungunya, dengue and Zika viruses, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 14(10): e0008475.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008475

Brady O., and Hay S., 2020, The global expansion of dengue: how Aedes aegypti mosquitoes enabled the first pandemic arbovirus, Annual Review of Entomology, 65(1): 191–208.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-024918

Collins E., Phelan J., Hubner M., Spadar A., Campos M., Ward D., Acford-Palmer H., Gomes A., Silva K., Gomez L., Clark T., and Campino S., 2022, A next generation targeted amplicon sequencing method to screen for insecticide resistance mutations in Aedes aegypti populations reveals an rdl mutation in mosquitoes from Cabo Verde, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 16(12): e0010935.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010935

Equihua M., Ibáñez-Bernal S., Benítez G., Estrada-Contreras I., Sandoval-Ruiz C., and Mendoza-Palmero F., 2017, Establishment of Aedes aegypti (L.) in mountainous regions in Mexico: increasing number of populations at risk of mosquito-borne disease and future climate conditions, Acta Tropica, 166: 316-327.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.11.014

Gao Q., Wang X., Chen W., and Zhang Y., 2021, Seasonal dynamics and spatial distribution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in southern China, Parasites & Vectors, 14: 456.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04945-4

Gubler D. J., 2011, Dengue, urbanization and globalization: the unholy trinity of the 21st century, Tropical Medicine and Health, 39(4): 3-11.

https://doi.org/10.2149/tmh.2011-S05

Gupta S., Kumar A., Srivastava S., and Ghosh S., 2020, Climate change and vector-borne diseases: understanding the link and addressing the challenges, Environmental Research, 191: 110038.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110038

Hamid P. H., Prastowo J., Widyasari A., Taubert A., and Hermosilla C., 2017, Knockdown resistance (kdr) of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Aedes aegypti populations from Indonesia, Parasites & Vectors, 10: 283.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2196-5

Hlaing T., Tun-Lin W., Somboon P., Socheat D., Setha T., Min S., and Walton C., 2021, Spatial and temporal dynamics of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Southeast Asia: implications for dengue control, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 15(4): e0009358.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009358

Kraemer M. U. G., Sinka M. E., Duda K. A., Mylne A. Q. N., Shearer F. M., Barker C. M., and Hay S. I., 2015, The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus, eLife, 4: e08347.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08347

Leta S., Beyene T. J., De Clercq E. M., Amenu K., Kraemer M. U. G., and Revie C. W., 2018, Global risk mapping for major diseases transmitted by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 67: 25-35.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2017.11.026

Liu N., 2015, Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: impact, mechanisms, and research directions, Annual Review of Entomology, 60: 537-559.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020828

Marini G., Guzzetta G., Baldacchino F., Arnoldi D., Montarsi F., Capelli G., and Rosà R., 2019, The effect of interspecific competition on the temporal dynamics of Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens in Italy, PLoS One, 14(12): e0225644.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225644

Moyes C. L., Vontas J., Martins A. J., Ng L. C., Koou S. Y., Dusfour I., and Ranson H., 2017, Contemporary status of insecticide resistance in the major Aedes vectors of arboviruses infecting humans, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 11(7): e0005625.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005625

Powell J. R., 2018, Mosquito-borne human viral diseases: why Aedes aegypti?, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 98(6): 1563-1565.

https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0866

Ramasamy R., and Surendran S. N., 2016, Possible impact of rising sea levels on vector-borne infectious diseases, BMC Infectious Diseases, 16: 269.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1602-7

Reiter P., 2001, Climate change and mosquito-borne disease, Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(Suppl 1): 141-161.

https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109s1141

Ryan S. J., Carlson C. J., Mordecai E. A., and Johnson L. R., 2019, Global expansion and redistribution of Aedes-borne virus transmission risk with climate change, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 13(3): e0007213.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007213

Shirai Y., Funakoshi K., Kamimura K., and Seki T., 2018, Interspecific mating and reproductive interference between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 34(4): 267-272.

https://doi.org/10.2987/18-6789.1

Smith L. B., Kasai S., and Scott J. G., 2016, Voltage-sensitive sodium channel mutations in insecticide-resistant mosquitoes, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 133: 1-12.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2016.03.005

Tatem A. J., Huang Z., Das A., Qi Q., Roth J., and Qiu Y., 2017, Air travel and vector-borne disease movement, Parasitology, 144(14): 1970-1980.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182017000829

Unlu I., Farajollahi A., Strickman D., and Fonseca D. M., 2013, Crouching tiger, hidden trouble: the impact of Aedes albopictus on local and global mosquito control programs, Annual Review of Entomology, 58: 401-421.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153618

Waldock J., Chandra N. L., Lelieveld J., Proestos Y., Michael E., Christophides G., and Parham P. E., 2013, The role of environmental variables on Aedes albopictus biology and chikungunya epidemiology, Pathogens and Global Health, 107(5): 224-241.

https://doi.org/10.1179/2047773213Y.0000000100

Zhang D., Xi Z., Li Y., and Dong Y., 2020, The Wolbachia-based population replacement strategy for mosquito control: successes, challenges and future directions, Frontiers in Microbiology, 11: 1989.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01989